<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Digital wills</title>
	<link>http://www.topofthemountains.net/2006/04/05/digital-wills/</link>
	<description>"Hitch your wagon to a star." —Ralph Waldo Emerson</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 14:39:42 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Ben</title>
		<link>http://www.topofthemountains.net/2006/04/05/digital-wills/#comment-77</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Apr 2006 21:43:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.topofthemountains.net/2006/04/05/digital-wills/#comment-77</guid>
					<description>Regarding eldavojohn's post, this showed up on one of the mailing lists I subscribe to:

&lt;blockquote&gt;
I've picked up a new hobby of hard binding books by hand.  When I've got enough material ready to bind on my computer, I lump it into a single file and organize it using OpenOffice.  Then I save it to a pdf.  After that, I use KPDF (and some print filters) to print it as several PDF files organized as the &quot;signatures&quot; of a book.  Then when I'm ready to bind it as a book, I print out the signatures to hard copy and bind up the book.  Electronic formats come and go and are still in a very high state of flux.  Books have been around for centuries and will last for a few more centuries still.  I find that this is the best way for me to preserve my electronic artifacts.  Plus, if it is done the right way, it only costs a little for all of the materials involved--including the glue and equipment.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I really like the idea of duplicating the electronic data (as much as possible -- the stuff that matters, really) in hardcopy.  For example, I've taken my mission e-mails home and printed them as a book (I've done the first of two volumes), and I plan to do the same with my mission journals (so I'll have the handwritten originals and the printed copies), and eventually with all my journals.  I figure that if I have 600 books on my shelves, I certainly have room for hard copies of my journals, which are irreplaceable.  Ideally one would have hard copies of everything and online/digital copies of everything, so that you're protected against any disaster.  But that's an ideal that's hard to achieve (let alone maintain).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding eldavojohn&#8217;s post, this showed up on one of the mailing lists I subscribe to:</p>
<blockquote><p>
I&#8217;ve picked up a new hobby of hard binding books by hand.  When I&#8217;ve got enough material ready to bind on my computer, I lump it into a single file and organize it using OpenOffice.  Then I save it to a pdf.  After that, I use KPDF (and some print filters) to print it as several PDF files organized as the &#8220;signatures&#8221; of a book.  Then when I&#8217;m ready to bind it as a book, I print out the signatures to hard copy and bind up the book.  Electronic formats come and go and are still in a very high state of flux.  Books have been around for centuries and will last for a few more centuries still.  I find that this is the best way for me to preserve my electronic artifacts.  Plus, if it is done the right way, it only costs a little for all of the materials involved&#8211;including the glue and equipment.
</p></blockquote>
<p>I really like the idea of duplicating the electronic data (as much as possible &#8212; the stuff that matters, really) in hardcopy.  For example, I&#8217;ve taken my mission e-mails home and printed them as a book (I&#8217;ve done the first of two volumes), and I plan to do the same with my mission journals (so I&#8217;ll have the handwritten originals and the printed copies), and eventually with all my journals.  I figure that if I have 600 books on my shelves, I certainly have room for hard copies of my journals, which are irreplaceable.  Ideally one would have hard copies of everything and online/digital copies of everything, so that you&#8217;re protected against any disaster.  But that&#8217;s an ideal that&#8217;s hard to achieve (let alone maintain).
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
