Comments on: The buddy system

by: Ben

Sat, 10 Nov 2007 22:44:00 +0000

Bart: :) I’ve heard a lot about Brian Regan, but the only skit I’ve seen of his was the “you too” one, or maybe it was the “take luck!” one. I can’t remember. :)

Rikker: Indeed, which makes it almost a miracle that anyone can communicate with anyone else. ;)

by: rikker

Sat, 10 Nov 2007 02:59:08 +0000

In my group of close childhood friends, “buddy” is an almost sacred term, not to be applied lightly. We use it to refer to one another, and it carries connotations of closeness and our long history together as friends. I realize this isn’t standard usage, though.

I agree that “buddy” and “bud” as used with strangers or casual acquaintances is condescending, along the lines of “champ”, “sport”, or “tiger”. The use of “buddy” is a huge A.P. cliche in the Mormon missionary world, for instance, and one that makes them seem insincere. Or that’s what I always thought when I heard it, at least.

Interesting how the same word can carry such different meanings in different contexts. Just goes to show often and easily we create our own super-specific languages in different social groups.

by: Bart

Sat, 10 Nov 2007 00:10:22 +0000

I agree that “buddy” seems a little condescending. Bud is even worse.

“Thanks, Bud.”

“My name’s not Bud.”

“Sure it is, Partner.” (Have you ever listened to Brian Regan (comedian? Just doing a little quoting.)